Africa in Memory (AIM) is guided by documented standards and transparent methodology. These standards exist to promote consistency, credibility, neutrality, and long-term trust in the records preserved within the AIM system.
The purpose of AIM is not simply to collect information, but to document African realities responsibly and preserve them in a structured and verifiable manner.
Core Principles
Every AIM record is guided by five foundational principles:
Accuracy over speed
Evidence over opinion
Preservation over publicity
Neutrality over advocacy
Long-term value over short-term attention
What Qualifies as a Record
AIM documents records that possess historical, cultural, scientific, educational, economic, geographic, institutional, or societal significance.
Records may include people, places, events, achievements, milestones, measurable distinctions, cultural heritage, technological developments, and other documented realities relevant to Africa.
Evidence and Documentation
AIM encourages the use of credible sources, documented references, research materials, institutional records, publications, and other forms of supporting evidence.
The strength of a record is determined not only by the claim itself, but by the quality and reliability of the evidence supporting it.
Neutrality and Balance
AIM seeks to document Africa without promoting political, ideological, religious, ethnic, national, or commercial interests.
The objective is responsible documentation and preservation. Records are evaluated according to evidence and documented significance rather than popularity, advocacy, or public sentiment.
The AIM Review Process
Records submitted to AIM progress through clearly defined stages:
- Submitted
- Under Review
- Verified
- Certified
Progression through these stages depends on review, evidence assessment, and established AIM standards. Advancement is never automatic.
Continuous Improvement
AIM recognizes that knowledge evolves over time. New evidence, improved documentation, and additional research may strengthen, clarify, or refine existing records.
The AIM methodology is therefore designed to support responsible revision while preserving transparency and historical integrity.